question
when you do nothing, because there is nothing you can do, doesn't it eliminate the intention to do nothing, because you wouldn't do a thing, therefore, there should be yet something you could do?
i am my own brainless daughter . and currently disappointed of myself
i am my own brainless daughter . and currently disappointed of myself
posted by anki at 6:53 PM
5 Comments:
totaly confusing.
well, u know it's like you thought about the other L, which actually should be there, but you decided against it.
meaning there was something, no no, when there is something, there will be nothing, when there is nothing!
kapiesch? - totally
nothing is something, it's the lack of something
noe
hhmmm, so like, nothing or the adoption of nothing could represent an absence of anything, assumed that there is something, which would be nothing?
and if there is nothing for a moment, then where is the problem? just let it be there, it might turn into something eventually
Kommentar veröffentlichen
<< Home